Neurodiversity Entrepreneurship: When enough is never enough
Neil Alexander-Passe1*
- City and Islington College; Department of Education; SEND Researcher & Author; UK
Abstract
This paper starts by reviewing various types of entrepreneurship, from scalable startups to social, researcher, and intrapreneurship. Neurodiversity is discussed, with the different conditions within this group. The report by Ives (2024) into Neurodiverse entrepreneurs reviewed 502 UK entrepreneurs, highlighting the barriers they faced in the workplace and why these led to them starting their own companies. 80% had hidden their neurodiverse needs in business situations due to the discrimination experienced, and only 19% had not experienced discrimination. Interestingly, 66% said they had struggled to find employment due to their neurodiverse differences, with only 16% indicating no difficulties faced. 64% said their neurodiversity meant setting up a company of their own was the only way to earn a living, suggesting barriers faced in traditional workplaces could be classed as discriminatory. Moving onto the study in this paper, five highly successful neurodiverse entrepreneurs were investigated (Elon Musk, Sir Richard Branson, Jeff Bezos, Bill-William Gates, and Sir James Dyson), with a review of their lives and workplace success and styles resulted in a significant amount of data from the internet and bibliography/autobiography sources. Several areas were investigated: how their neurodiversity manifests, their background, what they are known for, educational experience, personal beliefs, challenging how things are done, their working style, their management style, their knowledge, their mindset, and awards/honours received. Several themes emerged from the study: Risk, Challenging convention, and failure/resilience. All five samples had an extremely high tolerance to risk, both financial and personal, and it is argued that this is atypical for entrepreneurs. Due to their neurodiverse differences, they struggled in traditional workplaces and their high tolerance to risk came from their ability to see failure in a positive light, based on overcoming the emotional bonds to failure as a child in school. The ability to challenge conventional thinking was also seen to be part of creative and neurodivergent thinking, that ‘thinking out of the box’ comes from disregarding conventional thinking, challenging and solving problems. Each felt driven to prove themselves and their abilities, which may relate to being belittled as children, suggesting a deeply held low self-esteem and perceived low self-worth. ‘Never enough’ & ‘Imposter syndrome’ theories were discussed to attempt to explain the motivation of this group. The paper finishes by discussing creativity in school, which is argued to be behind a culture of avoiding mistakes (failure) at all costs. Sir Ken Robinson argues that young people are intuitively creative, but mainstream education, rather than promoting creative solutions, teaches that mistakes (creativity) should be avoided.
Keywords: Dyslexia, Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneur, Neurodivergent, Neurodiversity, Discrimination, Trauma, Underdog